Guides
From the LTC Wiki
We have recently made Camtasia recordings of some of our wiki workshops. The following are now ready for viewing:
This 40 minute recording goes over the basics of how to create and format wiki pages on the LTC's wiki installation. About 4 minutes into the recording a 'Wikis in Plain English' video is played which has no sound. You can view the video lower down in this wiki page.
2. More wiki formatting, skins and permissions
This 15 minute recording continues an exploration of wiki formatting, show examples of different skins and talks about the possibilities for controlling editing permissions.
This 10 minute recording explores a number of wikis that have been created both at the University of Manitoba and elsewhere.
A video that in 3 minutes presents wikis in terms of the problems they solve and basic approaches to their use - Wikis in plain english
The Educause Centre for Applied Research (ECAR) has published a research bulletin entitled "Supporting Knowledge Creation: Using Wikis for Group Collaboration" in which the authors argue that a number of conditions determine the successful use of wikis for knowledge creation. These conditions include:
"Research indicates that wikis go beyond technological innovations and related benefits and also offer a change of philosophy in relation to the knowledge creation process ... 'Wikis introduced groundbreaking innovations at the level of process, philosophy, and even sociology of such collaborative authoring' .. . 'Wikis offer a management philosophy that manages knowledge creation through evolution of norms and values rather than directives and incentives'"
".. conversational technologies such as wikis need people to share their knowledge, invite critique, present multiple points of view, and seek to change others' ides. Organizations that do not value such open-minded and non-hierarchical exchange of ideas may not find conversational technologies useful...'wikis work best in organizational cultures in which there is a high level of trust and control can be delegated to the system'"
Wikis - or more broadly, collaborative writing - have captured the interest of business leaders and academics. Well known, and increasingly referenced, is wikipedia - an online encyclopedia written by amateurs.
A wiki is basically a simple web page that anyone can edit. At least that's the standard description ... or what wikis were when first started. The openness of wikis has encountered the reality of human behaviour (or more precisely - spam). Wikis are chaotic, informal knowledge spaces. Wikis enable individuals to create a collective resource. Whereas blogs enable individual voices, a wiki over-writes individuality.
The messiness of wikis can be intimidating to newcomers. It doesn't make sense that openness could create as much order and structure as it does. Why do people contribute? What motivates individuals to spend time editing and proofreading sites? What about vandals who simply delete text? But wikis are not without governance or management. Wikipedia has extensive resources available on how to handle concerns arising from community conflict. Democracy and openness drive actions in this space. Consider their Policies and Guidelines or Resolving Disputes.
Wikis enable a history that allows individuals to reset or change any amendments. If, for example, an individual deleted important text, or inserted spam, community members can restore the site to previous states. Openness, while enabling potential for abuse, also creates a sense of communal ownership (in a recent presentation, I used a wiki to plan my keynote. I kept the wiki open, and found that spam was posted within a few weeks...but also that many readers took it upon themselves to delete the unwelcome content). Openness creates community, which creates responsibility wikipedia